Assessment of Pen and Paper Examination Development in Open and Distance Education: Implications for Academic Counselling

Authors

  • Dr. Augustine C. Ukwueze National Open University of Nigeria
  • Professor Patrick E. Eya National Open University of Nigeria

Keywords:

Evaluation, pen and paper, validity, distance education

Abstract

This study evaluated pen and paper examinations development with a view to improving examination validity in open and distance education. The study specifically examined the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of pen on paper examinations in the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN). The study employed the survey research design with a view to reaching a large number of respondents. In all, a total of 122 lecturers formed the respondents used for the study. A self-structured questionnaire was constructed and validated for data collection. Three research questions and two hypotheses were formulated to guide the study. The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical tool. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were used to answer the research questions while inferential statistics (t-test and ANOVA) were used to test the hypotheses at .05 level. The results show that valid procedures of item development and generation are always followed in setting pen and paper examinations in NOUN. Despite this, counsellors need to work on students and staff regularly on the rubrics of examinations to ensure both student and institutional success. The study, therefore, recommended appropriate procedures using Bloom’s taxonomy for test development.

Résumé : Cette étude a évalué le développement des examens au stylo et au papier en vue d'améliorer la validité de l'examen dans l'enseignement ouvert et à distance. L'étude a spécifiquement examiné la pertinence, la signification et l'utilité des examens au stylo et au papier de l'Université nationale ouverte du Nigeria (NOUN). L'étude a utilisé la conception de la recherche de l'enquête en vue d'atteindre un grand nombre de répondants. Au total, 122 professeurs ont formé le nombre de répondants utilisés pour l'étude. Un questionnaire auto structuré a été construit et validé pour la collecte de données. Trois questions de recherche et deux hypothèses ont été formulées pour guider l'étude. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide de l'outil statistique SPSS. Des statistiques descriptives (écart moyen et standard) ont été utilisées pour répondre aux questions de recherche, tandis que des statistiques inférentielles (t-test et ANOVA) ont été utilisées pour tester les hypothèses au niveau de 0,05. Les résultats montrent que les procédures valides de développement et de génération d'objets sont toujours suivies dans la mise en place d'examens au stylo et au papier à NOUN. Malgré cela, les conseillers doivent travailler régulièrement sur les rubriques des examens sur les étudiants et le personnel afin d'assurer la réussite des étudiants et de l’institution. L'étude a donc recommandé des procédures appropriées utilisant la taxonomie de Bloom pour le développement des tests. 

References

Agu, N. (2004). The effect of formative evaluation in reducing variations in the rate at which students of different achievement levels master instruction in mathematics. The Nigerian Educational Psychologist, 3(1), 66-79.

Ajiboye, S. K., Ojo, O. J., Saidu, A. B. & Okesina, F. A. (2014). Sources of examination anxiety among final year students of University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Studies in Education, 14(2), 213-219.

Al-Qdah, M. & Ababneh, I. (2017). Comparing online and paper examinations: Performances and perceptions of Saudi students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(2), 106-109.

Asika, N. (1991). Research methodology in the behavioural sciences, Lagos: Longman Nigeria PLC.

Border, L. D. & Drury, S. M. (1992). Comprehensive school counselling programmes: A review for policy makers and practitioners. Journal of Counselling and Development, 7(4), 104-108.

Chima, I. M. (2006). Self-confidence training and effective study habits as veritable strategies for curbing examination malpractices among secondary school students. The Nigerian Educational Psychologist, 4(2), 314-327.

Ezeh, C. O. & Onah, P. C. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in education. Enugu: Computer Edge Publishers.

Falayajo, A. (2004). Methods in evaluation. In O. A. Afemikhe & J. G. Adewale (Eds.). Issues in educational measurement and evaluation in Nigeria. Ibadan: ICEE.

Federal Ministry of Education, FME (2000). Blueprint on guidance and counselling for educational institutions in Nigeria, Abuja: Art and Culture Education Unit.

Kayode, B. (2006). Practical approach towards eliminating examination malpractices in Nigerian higher institutions. The Nigerian Educational Psychologist, 4(2), 262-268.

Kim, N., Smith, am. J & Maeng, K. (2008). Assessment online. Retrieved from c:\Documentsandsetthings\user\Desktop\ASSESSMENT ONLINE.htm.

Mengel, F., Sauermann, J. & Zolitz, U. (2017). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp.11000.pdf

Metzener, S. (2013). Teacher bias in public evaluation: A critical analysis. Journal of Teacher Evaluation, 22(7). 45-47.

Nenty, H. J. (2004). From classical test theory to item response theory: An introduction to a desirable transition. In O. A. Afemikhe & J. G. Adewale (Eds.). Issues in educational measurement and evaluation in Nigeria. Ibadan: ICEE.

Okonkwo, C. A. (2013). Building quality item bank for assessment of learning outcomes. In I. O. Salawu, A. I. Ikeotuonye & J. O. Inegbedion (Eds.). Perspectives on Nigerian education (51-77). Lagos: School of Education, NOUN.

Okoye, N. N. (1986). The challenges of Nigerian school certificate examinations. Ibadan: Evans Brothers.

Opateye, J. A. (2013). Test item generation and administration among secondary school teachers: Implications for achieving goals of education for all (EFA). In T. A. Bolarin & G. C. Unachukwu (Eds.). Education for all: Progress and challenges (334-343). Lagos: Nigerian Academy of Education.

Osuji, U. S. A. (2014). Group self-assessment and learning outcomes. NOUN Journal of Education, 1(1), 28-35.

Robbles, M. & Broathen, S. (2002). Online assessment techniques. Delta PI Epsilon Journal, 44(1), 39-49.

Schafer, W. D., Papapolydorou, M., Rahman, T. & Parker, L. (2005). Effects of test administrators’ characteristics on achievement test scores. Paper presented at the conference of the National Council on Measurement and Evaluation in Montreal, Canada.

Shukla, R. (2005). Dictionary of education. New Delhi: A. P. H. Publishing Corporation.

Ukwueze, A. C. (2012). Correlation between web-based continuous assessment and examination scores in open and distance education: Implications for academic counselling. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 27-37.

Published

2018-01-08

How to Cite

Ukwueze, A. C., & Eya, P. E. (2018). Assessment of Pen and Paper Examination Development in Open and Distance Education: Implications for Academic Counselling. West African Journal of Open and Flexible Learning, 6(2), 1–22. Retrieved from https://wajofel.org/index.php/wajofel/article/view/11

Issue

Section

Research Articles