Investigating the Compatibility, Challenges and Prospects of Legal Education in ODL Institutions: The Nigerian Perspective

Authors

  • Ferdinand O. Agama Department of Law, National Open University of Nigeria

Keywords:

Open and Distance Learning, Legal Education, Compatibility, Restrictive Rules, Technology

Abstract

Open and Distance Learning (ODL) provides present-day society with new means of imparting knowledge to learners. Due to its flexibility and potential cost savings, ODL delivery facilitates access to education for those whose financial and time resources inhibit their ability to pursue education through traditional modes. Presently, ODL is not yet one of the standard forms of instruction for legal education in Nigerian institutions. However, the idea of incorporating legal education in the ODL mode of teaching is becoming clearer by the day as influenced by technological and other forces. Legal education has been slow in adopting distance learning in Nigeria due, mainly, to the restrictive rules on it by the regulatory bodies. The paper investigated the compatibility of legal education in the ODL approach in the 21st Century. In a survey of a population of 97 year500 level Law students of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), conducted, the majority of the interviewees believe that legal education is compatible with ODL institutions and that graduates from such institutions are not after all, less in terms of competence, character and integrity. The paper concludes that, with advancements in technology, instruction in ODL has gone beyond just talking heads on the TV screen. It argues further that ODL when carefully designed and delivered, creates a high-quality academic experience and produces learner outcomes on par, if not superior to those of conventional in-class learning. The study recommends the reconsideration of the restrictive rules on the delivery of legal education through ODL, to optimise the opportunity it offers in a technology-driven world.

Résumé : La formation ouverte et à distance (FOAD) offre à la société actuelle de nouveaux moyens de transmettre des connaissances aux apprenants. Grâce à sa flexibilité et aux économies potentielles qu'elle permet de réaliser, la FOAD facilite l’accès aux nouvelles voies d'éducation à ceux dont les ressources financières et temporelles les empêchent de suivre des styles d'éducation traditionnels. Actuellement, la FOAD n'est pas encore l'une des formes d'enseignement standard pour la formation juridique dans les institutions nigérianes. Bien que ses promesses et ses perspectives de transmission du savoir soient en fait multiples, la FOAD n'a pas encore été largement adoptée au Nigeria. Cependant, l'idée d'incorporer l'enseignement juridique dans le mode d'enseignement de la FOAD devient plus claire et plus forte de jour en jour, sous l'influence de forces technologiques et autres. L'enseignement juridique a été lent à adopter l'apprentissage à distance au Nigeria, en partie à cause des règles restrictives imposées par les organismes de réglementation. Cet article constate que le souci de la qualité des résultats est au cœur de ces règles restrictives sur la FOAD dans l'enseignement juridique. L'article étudie donc la compatibilité, les défis et les perspectives de l'enseignement juridique dans l'approche de la FOAD au 21ème siècle. Il conclut qu'avec les progrès technologiques, l'enseignement et la formation en FOAD sont allés bien au-delà des simples têtes parlantes sur l'écran de télévision. Il affirme en outre que la FOAD, lorsqu'elle est conçue et dispensée avec soin, crée une expérience universitaire de haute qualité et produit des résultats pour l'apprenant équivalents, voire supérieurs, à ceux de l'apprentissage conventionnel en classe. Cette étude recommande de reconsidérer les règles restrictives de la FOAD afin d'optimiser les opportunités qu'elle offre dans un monde dominé par la technologie.

Mots-clés : Apprentissage ouvert et à distance, formation juridique, compatibilité, règles restrictives, technologie

References

Abika, J. (2014). Challenges of Open and Distance Learning in the Study of Law at NOUN. https://www.academia.edu/33532143/CHAPTER_FOUR_CH ALLENGES_OF_OPEN_AND_DISTANCE_LEARNING_IN_THE_STUDY_OF_LAW_AT_NOUN. Accessed on January 25, 2023.

Admissions and Matriculation Board Act, Cap. J1 (LFN) 2004. Section 5(1)(a).

Anene, F. (2012). Legal Education in an ODL Institution: Issues, Challenges and Prospects. < https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b- d&q=Legal++Education+in+an+ODEL+Institution%3A+Issu es%2C+Challenges+and+Prospects>. Accessed on January 24, 2023

Barry, M. (2012). Practice Ready: Are we there Yet? 32:2 Boston College J L & Soc Just 24.

Bhabha, F. (2014). Towards a Pedagogy of Diversity in Legal Education. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 52, 63.

Bukar, B. (2014). Legal Education and Challenges of Contemporary Developments in Nigeria. International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 20.

Cap. N81 and E3 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, (LFN), 2004.

Condlin, R. (2013). Practice Ready Graduates: A Millennialist Fantasy. University of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 48.

Cruz, P., et al. (2021). Optimising Legal Education through Technology-Driven Pedagogy. International Journal of Learning and Teaching Vol. 7, 18.

Distance Learning in Legal Education, A Summary of Delivery Models, Regulatory Issues and Recommended Practices’, (2011). Available at

. Accessed on June 2, 2022.

Dodek, A. (2008). Canadian Legal Ethics: Ready for the Twenty-First Century at Last. Osgoode Hall LJ 1.

Duncan, K., & Kenworthy, A. (2012). The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Participation on Students' Performance in Online Accounting Courses. Accounting Education 21(4):1-19.

Ebaye, E. (2009). The Crisis of Technological Underdevelopment in Africa. Journal of Contemporary Research Vol 6 (1)

Education (National Minimum Standards and Establishment of Institutions) Act

Fatunde, T., Law School at National Open University back on Track’ (10 December, 2020) University World News

Firth, N., & Newbery-Jones, C., ‘Digital assessment for the YouTube generation: Reflective practice in 21st-century legal education,” in Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law, A. Bone and P. Maharg, Eds., (Australia: ANU Press, 2019), pp. 51-78.

Idris, S. (2010). Management of Legal Education in The 21st Century in Nigeria. In O. Muzan, (ed), Legal Education in the 21st Century (p. 571). Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of NALT, Kogi State University, Anyigba.

Ikpeze, V.C. (2015). Legal Education in the 21st Century Nigeria: Need for Diversity in Content Paradigm. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalisation Vol. 39, 63.

Law School Rejection: Prevail on Council of Legal Education, NOUN urges NUC. August 9, 2016 Vanguard.

Legal Education (Consolidation etc.) Act 1976 contained in CAP L.10, Volume 8, LFN, 2004.

Legal Practitioners Act, 2004, Section 4 (1) (c).

Madubuike-Ekwe, N. J., (2017). Challenges and Prospects of Legal Education in Nigeria: A Overview. Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 8, 128.

Matasar, R., & Shields, R. (1995). Electronic Students Repercussions on Legal Educations. Valparaiso University Law Review, vo. 29, 909-933.

Means, et al. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. United States Department of Education.

National Universities Commission Act, Cap.N81 (LFN)2004. Section 4.

National Universities Commission, Benchmark Minimum Academic Standards (NUC BMAS) for Undergraduate Programmes (Law) in Nigerian Universities, April, 2007, p.1.

Ojogwu, C., & Aluta, A. (2009) ‘Analysis of the Learning Environment of University Students in Nigeria: A Case Study of University of Benin’. J. Soc. Sci. 19 (1), 69-73.

Okonjo V. Council of Legal Education {FCA/L.16/78 of 12 March 1979 (1979) Digest of Appeal Cases 28}.

Onalaja, M. O., (2016). Problems of Legal Education in Nigeria. . Accessed on January 25, 2023.

Reed, A. (1921). Training for the Public Profession of the Law: Historical Development and Principal Contemporary Problems of Legal Education in the United States with Some Account of Conditions in England and Canada. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York.

Scholle, C. (2020). Understanding the Socratic Method of Teaching. Abraham Lincoln University Press, California.

Sullivan, W., et al. (2007). Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Susskind, R. (2008). The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. Oxford University Press, New York.

Unini, C. (2015). Admission Requirements in Nigerian Universities. Available at https://thenigerialawyer.com/law-admission- requirements/. Accessed on September 16, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-05

How to Cite

Agama, F. O. (2022). Investigating the Compatibility, Challenges and Prospects of Legal Education in ODL Institutions: The Nigerian Perspective. West African Journal of Open and Flexible Learning, 11(1), 101–126. Retrieved from https://wajofel.org/index.php/wajofel/article/view/132

Issue

Section

Research Articles