Assessing the Impact of the Blended Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes: A Case of KNUST MELS-IDL

Authors

Keywords:

Blended Learning Model, Learning Outcomes, Students, Impact

Abstract

The study entails an investigation into the impact of blended model on students’ learning outcomes. The study was carried out at the Master of Philosophy (MPhil) Educational Innovations and Leadership Science (MELS) at the Institute of Distance Learning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. The study looked at areas such as identification of the components of the model that makes it helpful in distance learning, assessing the advantages and challenges of the model, and impact of the model on learning outcomes. The theoretical frameworks of the study are the Complex Adaptive Blended Learning System and the Community of Inquiry. The research utilised a mixed method approach, and information was gathered through semi-structured surveys, interviews, and observations. The study involved twenty-five participants consisting of twenty distance learning students and five instructors. The results indicated that the most impactful aspect of the blended approach lies in the integration of both online systems and conventional in-person instruction. It as well has some advantages which include flexibility, recorded videos being available after lectures, with internet connectivity being the main challenge. The impact of the model can be assessed in terms of its ability to help students understand a particular topic, and by comparing it to the conventional in-person instruction. The study will help the institution figure out the actual impact of the model on students’ learning outcomes, and the research should be replicated on other levels of learning institutions like undergraduate studies. 

Résumé : L'étude porte sur une recherche sur l'impact du modèle mixte sur les résultats d'apprentissage des étudiants. Elle a été réalisée dans le cadre du Master of Philosophy (MPhil) Educational Innovations and Leadership Science (MELS) à Institute of Distance Learning, Kwame Nkrumah Université of Science and Technology. L'étude examine des domaines tels que l'identification des composants du modèle qui le rendent utile dans l'enseignement à distance, l'évaluation des avantages et des défis du modèle, et l'impact du modèle sur les résultats d'apprentissage. Les cadres théoriques de l'étude sont le Système d'Apprentissage hybride Adaptatif Complexe et la Communauté de l'Enquête. La recherche a utilisé une approche mixte, et les informations ont été recueillies à travers des études semi-structurées, des entretiens et des observations. L'étude a impliqué vingt-cinq participants, dont vingt étudiants en apprentissage à distance et cinq instructeurs. Les résultats ont indiqué que l'aspect le plus impactant de l'approche hybride réside dans l'intégration des systèmes en ligne et de l'instruction conventionnelle en présentielle. Elle présente également des avantages tels que la flexibilité, la disponibilité des vidéos enregistrées après les cours, avec la connectivité Internet constituant le principal défi. L'impact du modèle peut être évalué en termes de sa capacité à aider les étudiants à comprendre un sujet particulier, en le comparant à l'instruction conventionnelle en personne. L'étude aidera l'institution à déterminer l'impact réel du modèle sur les résultats d'apprentissage des étudiants, et la recherche devrait être reproduite dans d'autres niveaux d'institutions d'apprentissage, comme les études de premier cycle.

Mots-clés : Modèle d'apprentissage hybride, Résultats d'apprentissage, Étudiants, Impact

References

Akai, G. (2022, June 16). Edutopia. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from www.edutopia.org: https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-blended-learning-explore-multifaceted-topics/

Alaa Zuhir Al Rawashdeh, E. Y. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analysing students’ perspectives. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(3), 107-117.

Allen, A. F. (1971). Perspectives on quality education. Educational Horizones, 49(4), 100-107.

Arnab, R. (2017). Survey sampling theory and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Limited.

Arnaiz-Sanchez, P. (2020). Schools that promote the improvement of academic performance and the success of all students. Journal of Education Psychology.

Bouffard, S. (2019). What does personalised learning mean? Experts weigh in. The Learning Professional, 40(4), 28-31.

Brown, J. (2008, May). Student-Centreed instruction: Involving students in their own education. Music Educators Journal, 94(5), 30-35.

Caulfield, J. (2011). How to design and teach a hybrid course: Achieving student-Centreed learning through blended classroom, online and experiential activities. Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing.

Dangwal, L. a. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116

Feiler, A. S. (2016). Measuring the effect of blended learning: Evidence from a selective Liberal Arts College. American Economic Review, 106(5), 368-372.

Freeth, T. (2014). Eclipse prediction on the ancient Greek astronomical calculating machine known as the Antikythera Mechanism. Plos One, 9(7), 1-15.

Garrison, A. a. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.

Glazer, F. (2011). Blended learning: Across the disciplines, across the Academy. New Pedagogies and Practices for Teaching in Higher Education. Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Habib, H. (2018). Effect of blended learning on student achievement. Journal of Multidisciplinary Subjects, 2(3), 1-5.

Helen A. Berbesada, J. Q. (2022). Blended instructions in the new normal and students learning gains in Mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(6), 398-400.

Horton, W. (2002). Designing web-based training (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Ismail, A.-G. Z. (2009). E- learning from application to professionalism (2nd ed.). Cairo: Alam Al-Kutob.

Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The Community of Inquiry framework. In Payne, C. R. (Ed.) Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 43-57.

Khader, N. S. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in improving students' achievement in third grade's science in Bani Kenana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 1-8.

Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education – Is the learning styles ‘myth’ important? Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444

Olejarczuk, E. (2013). The e-learning component of a blended learning course. Teaching English with Technology, 14(3), 56-68.

Resien, H. S. (2020). The Effect of blended learning strategy and creative thinking of students on the results of learning information and communication technology by controlling prior knowledge. Birle Journal, 879-893.

Rhouma, W. B. (2016). Perceptual learning styles preferences and academic. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 479-490.

Seuring. (2008). Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 13, 128–137.

Subramonian, S. (2015). Blended Learning Approach for Enhancing Students Learning Experiences in a Knowledge Society. i-mamager's Journal of Educational Technology, 11 (4), 1-7

Suwannaphisit, S., Anusitviwat, C., Tuntarattanapong, P., & Chuaychoosakoon, C. (2021). Comparing the effectiveness of blended learning and traditional learning in an orthopedics course. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 72, 103037.

Subandowo, R. a. (2020). Use of blended learning with moodle: Study effectiveness in elementary school teacher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 3272-3277.

Suk, J. (2023, September 4). Hurix digital. Retrieved October 19, 2023, from www.hurix.com: https://www.hurix.com/blended-learning-vs-traditional-learning-whats-the-difference/

Utami, I. S. (2018). The effect of blended learning model on senior high school students’ achievement. SHS Web of Conferences, 42(2), 1-6.

Wright, T. S. (2010). Information literacy in the digital age. Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing Limited.

Yuping wang, X. H. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Education, Technology, and Society, 18(2), 380-393.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Wiredu, S., Asante, E. A., & Alagbe, H. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the Blended Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes: A Case of KNUST MELS-IDL. West African Journal of Open and Flexible Learning, 12(1), 111–136. Retrieved from https://wajofel.org/index.php/wajofel/article/view/152

Issue

Section

Research Articles