Admission Practices of National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN): A Solution to the Challenges of Education Access in Nigeria
Keywords:
Admission practices, access to university education, gender equity, federal character principle, NOUNAbstract
The study investigated the admission Practices of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) in addressing the challenges of access, gender equity and promotion of federal character principle. The study population comprised 1425 academic and non-academic staff of NOUN in which 6 samples were purposely selected from the population. Interview protocol and documents were used for data collection. The study adopted a qualitative research approach using case study design. Data analysis involved thematic and content analysis via computer assisted software Nvivo 11. The results obtained indicated admission practices of NOUN were a combination of merit based, open access and computerized system of admission which made it possible for every applicant to be admitted without barrier. The result also revealed that although the practice of admission in NOUN had all that is required to address the challenge of access to university education, fear of acceptance, cost, technophobia and lack of awareness were the major reasons that impeded on access to NOUN. The findings also revealed that admission practices of NOUN addressed the challenges of gender equity in accessing university education by democratizing access to education, providing equal access opportunity to applicants and giving freedom to those restricted due to social conditions and the practices also circumvented geographical, religious and ethnic barriers, the process properly reflected the doctrine of federal character principle. The study recommends that Government should empower the institution to operate to it full capacity so that its vision will be fully realized. NOUN, Government and other stake holders should embark on massive sensitization to educate the public on the operation of the university and candidates who have lost out in the admission process of conventional universities should be encourage to apply in NOUN instead of wasting so many years trying to pursue admission in conventional Universities.
Résumé : L'article a étudié les pratiques d'admission de l’Université Nationale Ouverte du Nigeria (NOUN) pour relever les défis de l'accès, de l'équité entre les sexes et de la promotion du principe de caractère fédéral. La population étudiée comprend 1425 membres du personnel académique et non académique de NOUN, dans lesquels 6 échantillons ont été choisis à dessein parmi la population. Le protocole d'entrevue et les documents ont été utilisés pour la collecte de données. L'étude a adopté une approche de recherche qualitative utilisant la conception instrumentale d'étude de cas. L'analyse des données implique l'analyse thématique et de contenu via le logiciel assisté par ordinateur Nvivo 11. Les résultats obtenus indiquent que les pratiques d'admission de NOUN sont une combinaison de systèmes d'admission fondés sur le mérite, d'accès libre et d'informatisation qui a permis à chaque demandeur d'être admis sans obstacle. Le résultat a également révélé que, bien que la pratique de l'admission à NOUN ait tout ce qu'il faut pour relever le défi de l'accès à l'enseignement universitaire, la peur de l'acceptation, le coût, la technophobie et le manque de sensibilisation sont les principales raisons qui empêchaient l'accès à NOUN. Les résultats ont également révélé que les pratiques d'admission de NOUN ont abordé les défis de l'équité entre les sexes dans l'accès à l'enseignement universitaire en démocratisant l'accès à l'éducation, en offrant des chances d'accès égal aux candidats et en donnant la liberté à ceux qui sont exclus en raison des conditions sociales et en contournant également les barrières géographiques, religieuses et ethniques. Le processus reflète correctement la doctrine du principe de caractère fédéral. L'étude recommande que le gouvernement donne à l'institution les moyens de fonctionner à pleine capacité afin que sa vision soit pleinement réalisée. NOUN, le gouvernement et d'autres acteurs devraient se lancer dans une sensibilisation massive pour éduquer le public sur le fonctionnement de l'université et les candidats qui ont perdu dans le processus d'admission des universités conventionnelles devraient être encouragés à postuler à NOUN au lieu de gaspiller tant d'années à essayer de poursuivre l'admission dans les universités conventionnelles.
References
Anho, J. E. & Onojetah, S. O. (2007). Education reform and national development: Gender issues, access and equity in university education. A paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Philosophy of Education Association of Nigeria (PEAN) held at the Delta State University, Abraka, 16th – 21st October
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. London: Sage Publications (2nded)
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.4th ed, United States of America. Edwards Brothers, Inc.
Daly, K., & Gliksman (1997). The public health researcher: A methodological approach. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press. pp. 611–618.
Daniel, S. (2013). Federal character principle, a setback for Nigeria –MOMAH. Retrieved from www.vanguardngr.com/2013/08/federal-character-principle-a-set-back-for-nigeria-momah/ on 07/11/2015.
Ehiametalor, E.T. (2005). Issues of access, equity and private sector participation in the development of education. In G.O. Akpa, S.U. Udah & E.O. Fagbamiye (eds) Deregulating the Provision and Management of Education in Nigeria. Jos: The Nigeria Association for Educational Administration and Planning (NAEAP).
Fabunmi, M. (2005). Trade of Issues amongst Access, Equity, Autonomy, Quality and Sustainability in Deregulated Nigerian University Education. In G. O. Akpa, S. U. Udo and E. O. Fagbanmiye (Eds.) Deregulating the Provision and Management of Education in Nigeria. Jos: The Nigerian Association of Educational Administration and Planning (NAEAP).
Faubert, B. (2012). “In-school policies and practices for overcoming school failure: A literature review”, OECD Education Working Paper, OECD, Paris.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92.
Field, S., M. Kuczera and B. Pont (2007). No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education, OECD, Paris.
Federal Republic of Nigeria (1996). The Federal Character Official Gazette: Abuja
Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004). National Policy on Education. Lagos: NERC
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Igwe, U. (2012). Federal character: The hunter and the hunted. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Jegede, O. (2003). Welcome! … Experience a whole new world of learning. Prospectus, National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos: The Regent Ltd
Kanyip, B. P. (2013). Admission Crisis In Nigerian Universities: The Challenges Youth And Parents Face In Seeking Admission. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). Paper 1908.
McNiff, K. (2016). "What is Qualitative Research?". The NVivo Blog. QSR International. Retrieved March 12, 2017.
Meyer, N., & Bradley, D. (2013). Collaboratively Teaching Intellectual Freedom to Education Students. Education Libraries, 36 (1), 24-30.
Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denizin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S., Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
NPE (2004). National Policy on Education, Federal Republic of Nigeria 4th Edition.
NUC (2005). National Universities Commission accreditation of open and distance learning programmes in Nigerian universities: Programme evaluation form. Abuja, Nigeria: National University Commission (NUC)
National Open University of Nigeria (2015). NOUN 2014/2015 Annual Report, Victoria Island, Lagos: National Open University of Nigeria.
NOUN News Bulletin (2017). A monthly news bulletin of National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja.
Nwadiani, M., & Agbineweka, V. O. (2005). Managing university education in Nigeria: The imperativeness of deregulating government control. In G. O. Akpa, S. U. Udoh, & E. O. Fagbamiye (Eds.): Deregulating the provision and management of education in Nigeria (pp. 63-68). Lagos, Nigeria: NAEAP Publication.
Okebukola, P. (2010). Fifty years of higher education in Nigeria: Trends in quality assurance. Paper presented at the 50th Independence Anniversary Conference, New York.
Okoroma N. S. (2008). Admission Policies and the Quality of University Education in Nigeria, Educational Research Quarterly journal, Vol. 13.3 Retrieved on 4th May, 2016 from www.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/Ej788429.
Osuji, U. S. A. (2010). An Assessment of the Computer Literacy Level of Open and Distance Learning Students in Lagos State, Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 11(4). 149-158.
Salman, M.E., Yahaya, L.A. & Adewara, A.A. (2011). Mathematics education in Nigeria: Gender and spatial dimensions of enrolment. Int. J Edu Sci, 3 (1) 15-20.
Sawyerr, A. (2004). Challenges facing African Universities: Selected issues, African Studies Review, 47(1), 1-59.
Seda T. & Guler G. (2014). The Importance of the Open and Distance Education in terms of the Women's Preferences of Professional Field and the Women Employment, International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5, No. 6(1); May 2014.
Thiel, P., and Sack D. (2013). The Case Against Affirmative Action. Stanford Magazine.Retrived from http://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article on April, 28, 2017.
Tenebe V. A. (2016). NOUN News Bulletin. A Quarterly Publication of the Directorate of Media and Information, Volume 24 No. 24 January, 2016.
UNESCO (2003). Education Webmaster: World Conference on Higher Education Framework and Action. www.com.@yahoo. Aug 22nd.
World Bank (2001). The World Bank Annual Report 2001: Year in review (English) Washington, DC: World Bank
Wossmann, L. and Schütz G. (2006). “Efficiency and Equity in European Education and Training Systems”, Analytical Report for the European Commission prepared by the European Expert Network on Economics of Education (EENEE) to accompany the Communication and Staff Working Paper by the European Commission under the same title.