Learners' Perception of National Open University of Nigeria's Online Assessment Courseware Usability’

Authors

  • U.S.A Osuji

Keywords:

online assessment, courseware usability, open and distance learners

Abstract

Computer-based learning and assessment have become very popular throughout the world. This is as a result of the acceptance of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) as an effective mode of education. It has been proved to be cost effective, aside the fact that they are implemented for its various advantages and capabilities. Computer- based applications have been increasingly developed not only for teaching and learning in ODL but also for use in the normal classroom setting. It has also been proved beneficial for students with learning disabilities including slow learners. One of the examples of the computer- based applications is the online assessment used in the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN). This study is aimed at finding out the perception of the learners in NOUN in relation to the usability of the online assessment courseware being used for their assessment. An instrument termed Learners' Perception of Online Assessment Courseware Usability (LPOACU), was developed and administered on 200 level students from Owerri and Umudike centres of NOUN. A total of 124 respondents returned their instruments for analysis. The result shows that learners have positive attitude and perception towards the usability properties of the assessment courseware.

References

Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Retrieved December 10, 2012 from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013.

Behrouz, H.E Vani, M. & Abdel- Halim, E. (2009). A General-Purpose Software Evaluation System. Informatics, 33. pp.261 270.

Caplan, S.H. (1994). Making Usability a Kodak Product Differentiator. In: Wiklund,M.E. (Ed.). Usability in Practice. NY: AP Professional, pp. 21-58.

Dumas, J., & Redish, J. (1993). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Guillemette, R.A. (1989). Usability in Computer Documentation Design: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. IEEE

Transactions on Professional Communication, 32,217-228.

Holms, M. (2002). Web Usability and Navigation. New York: McGraw Hill.

ISO 9126 (1991). Software Product Evaluations- Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use, ISO DIS 9126.

ISO 9241 (1998). Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability.

ISO/IEC 9126-1 (2001). Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality model.

Keinonen, T. (1998). One-dimensional usability - Influence of usability on consumers' product preference. Saarijarvi, Finland: Gummerus.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.

Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 9(2), pp. 178—197.

Quesenbery, W. (2003). Dimensions of Usability. In: Albers, M., & Mazur, B. Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication. Mahwah.NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.

Rogers, Y., Sharp. H. & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction Design:

Beyond Human Computers' Interaction. (2nd edition). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Rosenbau, S. (1989). Usability Evaluation vs. Usability Testing: When and Why? IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 32,210-216.

Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Servet, B. & Albert, P. N. (2004). Evolution of Educational Software Evaluation: Instructional Software Assessment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOTET), Vol. 3(2), 4 p.21—27.

Shackel, B. (1991). Usability - context, framework, design and evaluation. In: B. Shackel & S. Richardson. (Eds). Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-38.

Syanzwan, W; Wan, F. W. A. & Yew, K. H. (2011). Study of Effectiveness and Usability of Multimedia Courseware Integrated with Three-Dimensional Model as a Teaching Aid. International Journal of Computer Application, Vol. 16, No. 4.20—27.

Downloads

Published

16-01-2014

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Learners’ Perception of National Open University of Nigeria’s Online Assessment Courseware Usability’. (2014). West African Journal of Open and Flexible Learning, 3(2), 153-165. https://wajofel.org/index.php/wajofel/article/view/296